Tres assistents d’IA davant del mateix repte
El creador del canal tef proposa una prova fàcil d’entendre: demanar a ChatGPT, Gemini i Claude que construeixin des de zero un joc de futbol inspirat en FC 26. Cada sistema disposa d’un màxim de tres instruccions i el resultat s’avalua jugant-lo, no només mirant el codi o una captura de pantalla.
L’objectiu no és reproduir tot un simulador comercial. En vuit minuts, el vídeo comprova si cada assistent pot generar un prototip recognoscible, executiu i mínimament divertit. El creador valora tres elements: aspecte visual, qualitat dels controls i sensació de partida. També demana que el joc sigui tridimensional o, com a mínim, que s’hi apropi.
La comparació té un guanyador clar per a l’autor, però no és un estudi científic. Les eines s’executen en interfícies diferents, els models i modes de raonament no són equivalents i les iteracions tampoc corregeixen exactament els mateixos errors. És una prova pràctica d’una sessió concreta, útil per veure patrons i limitacions, no una classificació universal.
ChatGPT crea Apex 11 i necessita una segona iteració
El primer torn és per a ChatGPT. Tef li demana un joc complet, jugable, atractiu, sense errors i visualment pròxim a FC 26. Després reutilitza una versió millorada de la mateixa instrucció generada pel propi assistent. El prototip resultant es diu Apex 11 i enfronta Orion City amb Vega United.
La primera versió funciona, però els controls no són evidents. El creador intenta xutar amb diverses tecles, corre cap a la porteria i només després troba que l’espai serveix per passar i una altra tecla per disparar. El desconcert inicial pesa en l’avaluació: un joc pot tenir totes les funcions essencials i continuar semblant poc accessible si no explica com utilitzar-les.
En la segona instrucció demana convertir-lo en 3D. El resultat s’assembla més a una representació en dues dimensions i mitja que a un partit plenament tridimensional, però la passada millora i selecciona de manera més directa el company. Fins i tot el porter atura un xut, un detall que sorprèn positivament. Tef li concedeix un sis sobre deu: és jugable i la càmera recorda un partit de futbol, però els futbolistes i la presentació queden lluny de l’objectiu visual.
Gemini prioritza l’aspecte però pateix amb el control
Gemini rep la mateixa base, amb l’afegit explícit que el joc ha de ser 3D. La primera versió, Virtual Pitch, mostra ombres i profunditat, però la pilota no queda clarament vinculada al jugador i l’equip controlat per la màquina troba massa fàcilment el camí cap a la porteria. Tef no localitza les instruccions i acaba movent i colpejant la pilota per prova i error.
La segona iteració demana figures més humanes i controls millors. Visualment hi ha un progrés immediat: els personatges deixen de semblar simples peces abstractes. El problema és que apareixen col·lisions i moviments erràtics, i el creador torna a descobrir les tecles sense una guia clara. La versió és vistosa, però la falta de previsibilitat impedeix dominar-la.
Tot i aquests errors, Gemini obté un set sobre deu. El vídeo premia que hagi complert millor la part estètica del repte. La puntuació també mostra que l’autor prefereix un prototip amb una identitat visual clara, encara que necessiti treball en física i usabilitat, abans que una demostració massa plana.
Claude guanya amb Striker Arena
Claude presenta Striker Arena i comença amb un avantatge pràctic: mostra els controls abans del partit. Les tecles de moviment, passada, xut i entrada queden identificades, de manera que el jugador pot provar el sistema des del primer moment. Aquesta petita decisió d’interfície canvia tota la percepció del resultat.
Quan es fa una passada, el control canvia al futbolista receptor. El detall permet encadenar jugades per la banda, tornar cap al centre i preparar el xut. També hi ha animació de gol, selecció de dificultat i una resposta prou consistent perquè Tef intenti robar pilotes, combinar i marcar diverses vegades.
El vídeo no diu que el codi sigui més net ni que la simulació física sigui realista. El criteri és més elemental i més important per a un prototip: aquesta és la versió que convida a continuar jugant. En pocs segons, l’autor deixa d’estar buscant què falla i comença a inventar jugades. Per això puntua Claude amb un nou sobre deu i el declara guanyador.
La lliçó dels controls i la informació visible
La diferència principal no és la quantitat de gràfics. ChatGPT i Gemini aconsegueixen partits recognoscibles, porteries i futbolistes, però amaguen o compliquen la gramàtica de joc. Claude fa visible aquesta gramàtica i associa cada acció a un resultat comprensible. El jugador sap què ha premut, quin personatge controla i per què la pilota canvia de direcció.
És una lliçó aplicable a qualsevol producte generat amb IA. Demanar “fes-lo millor” o “fes-lo 3D” pot produir una millora superficial. Una instrucció més útil defineix comportaments verificables: mostrar una pantalla de controls, canviar automàticament al receptor, impedir que la pilota travessi jugadors o reiniciar el partit sense trencar l’estat.
Les plataformes oficials de Gemini i Claude descriuen capacitats per generar i treballar amb codi, però cap documentació substitueix les proves del producte. L’assistent pot redactar molts fitxers correctes i, tanmateix, fallar en una decisió d’experiència d’usuari que només es detecta quan algú juga.
Què demostra i què no demostra la comparació
El vídeo demostra que els tres sistemes poden convertir una petició breu en un prototip interactiu en molt poc temps. També demostra que la primera versió rarament és suficient: ChatGPT necessita una conversió visual, Gemini una correcció dels personatges i Claude es beneficia d’haver organitzat millor les ordres des del principi.
No demostra quin model programa millor en general. Per fer una comparació més sòlida caldria utilitzar el mateix entorn, fixar tecnologies i recursos, conservar totes les instruccions, mesurar errors, revisar el codi i repetir l’experiment diverses vegades. També caldria separar el rendiment del model del de la plataforma que executa i previsualitza el projecte.
La nota de l’autor és deliberadament subjectiva. Premia la diversió immediata, mentre que un equip professional pot valorar mantenibilitat, accessibilitat, rendiment o seguretat. Un prototip que guanya un vídeo de vuit minuts podria no ser el més fàcil de continuar desenvolupant.
Claude s’imposa perquè el prototip ja sembla un joc
El resultat final és ChatGPT amb sis punts, Gemini amb set i Claude amb nou. ChatGPT construeix una base funcional; Gemini ofereix la transformació visual més visible; Claude combina resposta, controls i ritme d’una manera que fa oblidar durant uns instants que es tracta d’una demostració generada.
La millor conclusió no és que una IA pugui recrear FC 26 amb tres frases. Els prototips no inclouen la profunditat, llicències, animacions, modes, xarxa ni equilibri d’un títol comercial. El que sí mostren és com ha baixat el cost de convertir una idea en una primera experiència jugable.
En aquest nou flux de treball, la persona continua tenint una funció decisiva: definir què vol dir “jugable”, provar cada versió i convertir sensacions vagues en correccions concretes. Claude guanya aquesta ronda, però la qualitat de la següent dependrà tant del model com de la capacitat del creador per observar, descriure i iterar.
Contrast i context
Fonts consultades
-
01
YouTube — tef ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude Make FC 26 From Scratch
-
02
YouTube Canal de tef
-
03
Google AI for Developers Documentació de l’API de Gemini
- 04
Font de treball
Transcripció amb marques de temps
Consulta la transcripció
-
0:00
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Today we have a banger video on our hands. We are going to be making FC 26 from complete zero. We're going to be seeing which AI can do this the best with no gay menj and whatsoever. Guys, I've heavily requested this video. And the world cup is going on. So let's see if these AI can make FC 26. Alright, here we have ChagbT 5.5 Ultra High. And then we have Google Gemini 3.1 Pro on high thinking in the Antigraphity platform. And yes guys, Gemini 3.1 Pro is very accoding then 3.5 Flash. I just want to put it out there. So stop lying to me. And then finally we have Claude in Claude code with Opus 4.8 because Fable 5 is not available on Ultra Code. So let's jump right into this and give ChagbT our first prompt. And I'm going to give these AI max 3 prompts to make a fully fleshed out version of FC 26.
-
0:50
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Alright, so here's the prompt. I just told ChagbT to make the game from complete zero. Make sure it's a good playable version and very engaging. And make no errors. Make sure it's visually similar to FC 26. We actually have a good clone game. I find that adding this helps out the AI lot. And also to make the prompt better so it gets repasted. And ChagbT is the best at writing prompts. Where's going to use the prompt that ChagbT gives us to repeat an ETI. The whole fleet gave us the best result. So let's send this in and yeah, I'm going to let ChagbT cook this up. Honestly, don't know who's going to win this. It's Gemini might make the game look better than the other two. I bought like clawed my play better and ChagbT in my overall be good. But we're going to see anyway, let's paste this prompt back into ChagbT.
-
1:33
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Boom. And now ChagbT is off and making our clone game. So I'll come back when this is done. While it's doing that though, I'm going to need you to like the video and subscribe right now. Yeah, I'm looking at you buddy. Like the video. Alright, ChagbT is done. Let's see this. It called it apex 11. That word fraud. Hey, here's apex 11. Orion City versus Vega United. If you guys didn't know, my favorite team is Manchester United and before he called me and saying, okay, I know we haven't won anything recently, but we're still going to do that. I mean, Rooney's still in my heart. Yeah, let's start the match and let's just test out the game. See how it feels. Okay, so um, it doesn't look too terrible. I don't really not to kick the ball. That's the only thing. Bro, they just fouled me. This is not FIFA. Like this is definitely not FIFA.
-
2:19
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
How do I kick the ball again? Based on not E is not Q. Is there controls? Let me just run into the goal at this point. I'm not gonna lie guys. I don't know how to have a block or school. Okay, I scored a goal. I don't know how to pass. We 100% don't necessarily still snap. They took the ball. Okay, now my been playing the controls wrong. Space is the pass. Sue is Jay. Tackle is Kay. Alright, let's try this again. Let's pass it. Space. Okay, this is pass it. Okay, I missed. That was on me. My guy just took the ball. Jay is the kick. I'm pretty sure. Hold on. Let me. But I keep kicking at the wrong way. Okay, you know what? This is pretty playable. And now let's tell this to make it 3D. That's gonna be the challenge right here. Alright, so the second iteration is finally done.
-
3:00
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
But let's check it out right here. Now it should be 3D. Let's start the match. Okay, it's kind of 3D. It's like 2.5D to be honest. Alright, let's pass the rock to another member. Okay, the passing is definitely better though. As it goes directly to like the next player. This is actually better. Actually, really like this. Let's try score goal here. I don't know if you guys ever made like paper football, but I used to make this one a younger. So we were minding up. And I was like use paper to pass it. And stuff. I thought I was like winning a world cup when I was like two. He saved it. Wow, the goalkeeper actually saved it. I came to see my character. I'm not gonna lie. Oh wait, never mind. I'm gonna give Taji BTA solid like six out of ten. Like I can kind of play this. But I expect it like a player model more FIFA.
-
3:42
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Like I got the camera view down. I'll be honest. Now I'm gonna give this a solid six out of ten. Alright, now we're on to Google Gemini 3.1. I'm gonna throw on high. We're gonna paste in the exact same problem. We gave Taji BTA. And let's add in. Make sure it is 3D. Thus in case you know me, might make a 2D version. So hopefully you'll save us a prompt. Anyway, let's send it in. Let's let Gemini cook. It's been a while since we used Gemini on the channel because it's been so bunched. But let's use it one more time just to verify. Hopefully, it actually saves itself. Because Jill and 5.2 came out, which is a Chinese AI model. And I've been using it more than Gemini because it's just clearly better in my opinion. And it's damn near free. Let's see if Gemini can handle making FC 26. Alright Gemini seems to be done.
-
4:27
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
So let's open this up. And here it is. It's called a virtual pitch. So let's kick off. Okay, the visuals don't look that amazing. I'll be 100% honest. And the ball doesn't even stick to us, which I kind of weirdly like. And we kind of just move the ball around. The bluepeak stay together for some reason though. You know, I can't even score. Okay, you know, they're taking our goal. Why was no one guarding it? Okay, kind of sticks to us, but kind of doesn't. We're ordered the controls on this bro. Gemini didn't even give me the controls. I'm kind of just kicking up all around. They're rather score. They're rather score. Guys, get the ball. I'm not gonna lie. This is some bunch bro. This is not that good. But like, at least it made it kind of 3D. And there's nice shadows at least. I mean, that's something to admire. Oh, are they about to score?
-
5:14
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Are these AI's about to score? What are they doing guys? Look at this. Not Gemini, you're fried, but I'm gonna give it one more prompt. And that's just to make them look a bit more humanoid. And I want like better control. Alright, so let's let it cook. And hopefully it doesn't give us a slot bro. We want messy here. I've never know of it. We want the best. Oh, last day is about to make someone mad in the comments. And that's exactly what I wanted. That's exactly why I said it. Okay, that actually finished it surprisingly fast. Now let's open it up virtual pitch and let's kick off. Okay, oh wow, we have some, okay, now it's more humanoid. I actually really like this. This is what I was expecting, Taddy VT to make, but I think from that thing anymore. Only thing is I don't know the control, bro. Oh, and they stole the ball from me.
-
5:58
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
I already got to score. Oh my gosh, I just reset it. They're all glitching. Oh my goodness. I think K is to kick. It kind of is the ball forward. Yeah, I'm not gonna lie. There's too much glitching. The controls aren't that like, doesn't really give me the best controls. But I like how it looks that I can lie. I knew Gemini was gonna make it look good. I'm gonna give this a solid 7. I've already played this and whatever, Taddy VT made to be honest. Do you know Gemini got this one? Last but not least, finally. Lot of open 4.8 on Ultra Co. So let's paste into the exact same problem we gave the last two. And let's just send it in and see where Kla takes us. I don't think Kla will make it look the best if I'm being honest. I do think Kla will make it play the best
-
6:36
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
and that's what I'm interested to see. But hopefully it proves me right? Because right now, Gemini's in the lead, which is rare to see. Very rare. So let's see if Kla could take out Gemini or lose the Gemini. Give Gemini his first win in a long time. So I'll come back when this has something. And finally, it is done. But here we have Shriker Arena. And here's the control. So let me just memorize this. Hey, here is Kla's version. So let's put on easy. And let's just keep this on standard. I guess, okay, it's the shoe and WSD is to move. So let's start this. And J is the pass. Okay. Whoa, you got to play. The playing is way better. Gameplay feels way better. You guys probably can't tell. Like the controls are actually straight. Let's pass it up here and receive that. And as you pass it, it switches your player,
-
7:22
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
which is very important. Because it didn't do that last time. Whoa. And there's a goal animation. Yeah, I'm not gonna lie. Don't need like 30 seconds of gameplay. This is way better. Alright, let's try to score the K. Oh, oh my goodness. This is actually really good. Well, it's still this. Let's still this. Let's still this goal goal. Oh my god, we are the best. We are the best coming here. I guess L is too tackle way. Let me see. Yeah, L is too tackle. Okay, I can pass it up. I'm pass it up the wing up the wing. Back to the middle. Back to the wing. Go! Oh my goodness. Yeah, this is way more fun. This is the best one. And it's down. I'm giving this a solid 9 out of 10. This is the most fun I had playing. A freaking AI game in a very long time. Actually, really like this.
-
8:02
, obre el vídeo en una pestanya nova
Oh, another goal. Four one bro. We're about to Brazil them. And like the 2014 World Cup. Even if you know, you know, go again. That's seven one Brazil match against Germany was hard crushing. Actually cry and I have been trolling. I literally cried my eyes out when I saw that game. We got to get seven goals. Anyways, this was really good. Let me know what AI you think they're the best. I'm pretty sure Claude is going to be the winner though, because this thing did amazing. Yeah, I'll see you guys in the next one. This was super interesting. Ciao to the World Cup. I predict that France is going to win their team is crazy.
